Відео

1mph = 3 spoons per cubic centimeter 😙👍🤣🤣 (miles per hour doesn't help the rest of the world by the way, lmfao)

Waste of time and money

Thanks. Helped for me to understand pwat better!

usiness memo: specifics of refunds and the actions to anticipate

What's on the horizon? Exclusive interview with Binance's CEO reveals future insights

Hold onto your hats, here's important refund info

Notification: your cash is making a comeback

Don't miss out on a chat with Binance's CEO about the future - exclusive interview

Chat im at the max level i repeat chat im at the max level

System error: delivery to an invalid email confirmed!

What the app name

840 Like Hello.

would be worth updating this with modern 3d modeling methods

A vital program. Wish I knew this earlier

🌬️

Well done video!

❤

Since I pay my phucking taxes and more than most, the US GOVT should provide access to CORS for FREE. Only a small handful of states do, but the rest charge about $1000 year to connect to them. BS.

Noise and statics

24mph and the trees are basically still. Out my window they are bucking and swaying in 24mph winds?!

Why TF a scale in retard units

Could you do The Dutch Coast 3D that would be amazing.

rip to whatever family that was in that house

In 54 mph wind rn

2:39pm dean

Nice

This is a concisely informative overview of the concept of Geodesy! 👏🏾

otis was level 5... god bless MExico acapulco

Exacto!!! Gracias Bro...

The same things could be done with high altitude balloons. Oh wait! That is actually what they are using! What you are seeing here is science fiction propaganda.

Please adopt and use metric officially for surveying in US as well, which gets rid of headaches like this! I am experiencing this exact issues as a survey technician!

At what distance is water no longer a useful tool for ascertaining a horizontal level?

Hi Brock. This is Ron MacFayden. . I'm the only other Canadian besides Marie. lol. Good to see you are doing well brother, PS,,,Thanks for hiring me, it lead to a very fullfilling career.Take care. Im using my ladys computer. Cheers

This really is a Beautiful Wind Speed Example

Thank you

Muy útil está información, tengo varias propiedades muy cerca de la playa, a unos 250 m y 300 m de la misma, unos 3 m sobre el nivel del mar, así que ya un huracán categoría 2 puede generar problemas, y no se diga 3, 4 o 5...

Great information

Bro forgot Storm surge

Thanks

please answer my question, how can I download a given regin in this satellite data?

thx

great tutorial...

crystal clear to know about accuracy and precision, thank you so much....

🙊🙉🙈🐒💩🌏💩 George Orwell on 🌏: “Does *NOT* rest on *REASONING* or on *EXPERIMENT* but on *AUTHORITY* “ ‘As I Please’ “SOMEWHERE or other-I think it is in the preface to Saint Joan-Bernard Shaw remarks that we are more gullible and superstitious today than we were in the Middle Ages, and as an example of modern credulity he cites the widespread belief that the earth is round. The average man, says Shaw, can advance not a single reason for thinking that the earth is round. He merely swallows this theory because there is something about it that appeals to the twentieth-century mentality. Now, Shaw is exaggerating, but there is something in what he says, and the question is worth following up, for the sake of the light it throws on modern knowledge. Just why do we believe that the earth is round? I am not speaking of the few thousand astronomers, geographers and so forth who could give ocular proof, or have a theoretical knowledge of the proof, but of the ordinary newspaper-reading citizen, such as you or me. As for the Flat Earth theory, I believe I could refute it. If you stand by the seashore on a clear day, you can see the masts and funnels of invisible ships passing along the horizons. This phenomenon can only be explained by assuming that the earth’s surface is curved. But it does not follow that the earth is spherical. Imagine another theory called the Oval Earth theory, which claims that the earth is shaped like an egg. What can I say against it? Against the Oval Earth man, the first card I can play is the analogy of the sun and moon. The Oval Earth man promptly answers that I don’t know, by my own observation, that those bodies are spherical. I only know that they are round, and they may perfectly well be flat discs. I have no answer to that one. Besides, he goes on, what reason have I for thinking that the earth must be the same shape as the sun and moon? I can’t answer that one either. My second card is the earth’s shadow: when cast on the moon during eclipses, it appears to be the shadow of a round object. But how do I know, demands the Oval Earth man, that eclipses of the moon are caused by the shadow of the earth? The answer is that I don’t know, but have taken this piece of information blindly from newspaper articles and science booklets. Defeated in the minor exchanges, I now play my queen of trumps: the opinion of the experts. The Astronomer Royal, who ought to know, tells me that the earth is round. The Oval Earth man covers the queen with his king. Have I tested the Astronomer Royal’s statement, and would I even know a way of testing it? Here I bring out my ace. Yes, I do know one test. The astronomers can foretell eclipses, and this suggests that their opinions about the solar system are pretty sound. I am therefore justified in accepting their say-so about the shape of the earth. If the Oval Earth man answers-what I believe is true-that the ancient Egyptians, who thought the sun goes round the earth, could also predict eclipses, then bang goes my ace. I have only one card left: navigation. People can sail ships round the world, and reach the places they aim at, by calculations which assume that the earth is spherical. I believe that finishes the Oval Earth man, though even then he may possibly have some kind of counter. It will be seen that my reasons for thinking that the earth is round are rather precarious ones. Yet this is an exceptionally elementary piece of information. On most other questions I should have to fall back on the expert much earlier, and would be less able to test his pronouncements. And much the greater part of our knowledge is at this level. It does not rest on reasoning or on experiment, but on authority. And how can it be otherwise, when the range of knowledge is so vast that the expert himself is an ignoramous as soon as he strays away from his own speciality? Most people, if asked to prove that the earth is round, would not even bother to produce the rather weak arguments I have outlined above. They would start off by saying that ’everyone knows’ the earth to be round, and if pressed further, would become angry. In a way Shaw is right. This is a credulous age, and the burden of knowledge which we now have to carry is partly responsible.”

See those LINES w a VERTEX??? CANNOT happen on a sphere. There is no such thing as a right angle on a globes surface.

Hihi funny arrow thingy go brr

I’m here to shoutout the Colorado flag. Thank you & goodbye 👋

Ayoo siapa yang sedang diklat PPSDM

why the pressure n the top is higher than the pressure in the bottom of the cilinder?

Testing.